Click here for lightsabers
  • Home
  • Help
  • Login
  • Register
Pages: 1 ... 2427 2428 [2429] 2430 2431 ... 3571   Go Down
Author Topic: Random Thoughts of Members (anything goes...well with in forum rules)  (Read 5869417 times)
DarthScrub
Knight Commander
*

Force Alignment: -580
Posts: 1704


Fin Fus Fent Stin Zu'u


« Reply #36420 on: August 21, 2016, 01:09:08 AM »

pretty much, but all the kids were Jason

this kinda makes me want to break out batman and batman returns?

Dont get me started on my terrible objectification of Catwoman LOL




Also, that custom title is amazing



As they are still in high school, I think they will focus on MJ's early years and her troubled home life, contrasting with the mask she wears in public. I don't think she and Peter will get together in this movie though. That is inkeeping with the comics, but will give them room to grow with future movies if they just show that their are friends and show the beginnings/potential for romance.

They have said they are going for a John Hughes style high school movie. With superpowers. Which I think is gonna be awesome. Although with three villains mentioned I hope they don't do a Spiderman 3 and over stuff the movie. I'd prefer the opening scene to start mid-battle with the Shocker and then show him being late for school, with the Tinkerer being a minor presence and the Vulture being the big bad.
i liked the first Amazing Spiderman and it was a great foundation for future events movies. However I thought the second was awful, as the studio was so concerned with making a franchise of spider spin-off movies they forget to make ASM2 good.

Andrew Garfield was great as Parker but I fully understand recasting him. Not his fault, but Marvel want a clean slate for introducing him into the MCU.

I think it comes down to taste though. Spiderman 2 was questionable, and 3 was complete trash in my opinion. The Amazing Spiderman 2 dropped the ball with Goblin, but I enjoyed their attempt at recreating Electro and bringing him to the big screen
Logged

Want a custom avatar? Shoot me a PM, you can view my work here!

LivingBrain
Knight Lt. Commander
*

Force Alignment: 46
Posts: 459



« Reply #36421 on: August 21, 2016, 01:32:12 AM »

lmao I love movies, I don't mind a discussion. What is your opinion of the films?

Awesome! So, the first thing I'm going to get out is that they make me kind of sick. The reason I have that reaction is because I feel they misunderstand the significance of Spider-Man.

What I think is important about Spider-Man is that he has selfish tendencies, but he gets punished for them and, because of the death of Uncle Ben, actively works against those tendencies as a form of penance. This is essentially what "with great power comes great responsibility" means. If you have power, you need to use it for the good of others rather than yourself. Peter initially used it for himself and it led to Ben being killed, which changes him forever. On top of that, he has the worst luck in existence, so fun just doesn't come naturally to him.

The first movie was decent enough and I like parts of it, but I thought it really fumbled with the after effects of Uncle Ben's death and with Spidey wanting to break his promise to Captain Stacy at the end. The reworking of Uncle Ben's death was good. It kept the selfishness (wanting the chocolate milk but not getting it then not stopping the robber as revenge), then had the tragedy leading from it (that robber then kills Uncle Ben, who tried to stop him, which is extra great because it shows Ben using power responsibly, which gives that motto more significance). So, his death is super good, and Martin Sheen was fantastic as him.

It's after that that I get frustrated, because then they have Peter go on this "path of revenge" to find the killer, then they never follow through with it because it gets dropped for... I don't know why it was dropped. Studio interference?

The effect this has on the character is that he essentially didn't learn his lesson from Uncle Ben, and he's not given the opportunity to because then the Lizard comes and the new goal is to stop him. While it's good to stop the Lizard, when you don't finish out the Uncle Ben plot and have that Lizard one directly interfere with it you destroy the character arc you were building. As a result, Peter doesn't learn his lesson.

So then Captain Stacy's death comes and maybe this will be what makes him learn and he seems to when he promises to stay away from Gwen to keep her safe... but then he hints he'll break that to her in the final minutes of the movie, which throws all of that out the window too. On top of that, Captain Stacy himself chose to get involved, so that makes his death more his fault rather than Peter's responsibility, meaning he doesn't really have to learn from it because Captain Stacy got himself into it.

Basically, what this means is that we end the first film with a Spidey that hasn't learned his lesson after two people have died in front of him, and one of them he didn't even have any responsibility for, so there's no reason for him to learn.

So then AMAZING 2 happens and they realize their mistake and do a weird waffling back and forth between being together or not with Gwen and Peter, but they have all kinds of things like Spidey's quipping being a form of bullying rather than him trying to hide his nervousness (he never appears to be nervous in conflicts with villains. He's always in control, so that makes the quipping appear much more mean than it should be. On top of that, in the Times Square battle he's given an audience that cheers for him so, rather than have a Spidey who has to struggle with others' perceptions of him, he's actively rewarded and celebrated, which paints this Spidey as one where the world just automatically loves him rather than the one who had to struggle with how others saw him). Then the death of Gwen happens and, rather than having his web be what kills her, she hits the ground.

This reframes the whole situation. In the comics, Spidey webbed up Gwen to save her, but his cosmically bad luck got in the way and the force killed her. What's even better is that he was very boastful as he pulled her up, drunk on victory, but then he realized she was dead. So not only do you have Spidey's typical bad luck, but you have a resurgence of his arrogant tendencies being tempered by harsh reality. In AMAZING 2, he was just too slow, which abdicates him of responsibility for her death and makes it more the Goblin's fault rather than a shared crime between the two of them. So then he just mopes for 5 months until Gwen's speech gives him a pep talk.

This is another instance of him not learning from a major character death, and in this case it seems like the writers wanted to actively avoid it, which frustrates me because that shows they don't understand the character. It's also another case of him having no responsibility for a death which, to me, is not a Spidey thing.

On top of all of this stuff related to death, him being the only one that the Spidey formula could have worked for undermines the everyman aspect of the character, along with him standing up to Flash before having his powers. This reframes the whole character as someone whose inner awesomeness was unlocked by a power-up rather than an average, every day individual being given incredible power by fate and having to step up and learn to be a hero. It also feels very entitled to me, because rather than working to be a good person he just "is" a good person.

So in short, I don't think the AMAZING movies understand the character. I think Garfield himself does (the scene in AMAZING 2 with him helping the bullied kid was his idea, and his Comic Con speech was awesome, and there was also an awesome thing where he played basketball with some kids in New York while on set in full costume, and he does deliver the quips really well even if I think they're too mean for the character), but he's trapped in movies that don't get the character at all. The multiple deaths that he didn't learn from (2 of which he had no responsibility for), him just inherently being good (but then not matching up to that after? These movies are kind of weird), his quips being more in line with a bully than someone in over his head, and the whole world instantly loving him, make me not like his portrayal. Garfield himself is fine, but the films are clueless, and it makes me really frustrated.

So that's my whole spiel lol. I do think the movies had great Spidey costumes (I even love the ASM 1 costume), his movements in web swinging and combat were all perfect, and Uncle Ben was incredible, but I think they miss everything else. What do you think?
Logged

I like movies, Spider-Man, and lightsabers.

That's about it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

My username and avatar may be of a villain, but I like Light Side points.

DarthScrub
Knight Commander
*

Force Alignment: -580
Posts: 1704


Fin Fus Fent Stin Zu'u


« Reply #36422 on: August 21, 2016, 02:02:38 AM »

Alright, I understand your argument and you've brought up good points, especially the unfinished arc with Uncle Ben. However, looking at this purely from the cinematic universe, and not using the comics as a reference to the character, this Spiderman didn't need a catharsis from being too arrogant. He was a teenager that acted upon impulse and that tragically lead to Ben's death. But as you said, the other deaths, especially Gwen's, weren't his fault. Gwen made a point to Peter just before the fight that she controls her own actions, and any consequences would fall on her. Therefore, this Spiderman wasn't meant to be a character that suffered from being arrogant and thus didn't need an event to go through a transformation to come out a better hero. I think as a comic book character, that's pivotal, but as a movie it wasn't a factor they focused on. One could say that, yes, this is the result of ignorance of the character; I think one could say it was intentional to mirror events from the comics without the same narrative.

Looking at this strictly using no other source material, these were two solid movies. The first TAS was great in establishing the origin of Peter Parker / Spiderman while creating another subplot of mystery with his parents. You're correct to bring up Uncle Ben's arc being pushed to the side in favor of the main antagonist, I have no argument against that. The second movie got a little shaky with their character designs, especially Goblin, but I loved that Rhino wasn't just some guy in a suit (lmao well he was, but at least this suit was mechanical Cool), and I appreciate what they did with Electro. I was genuinely intrigued with where they were going with Norman Osborn as well as how Harry's actions would affect our hero. Gwen and Peter had a lot of chemistry that didn't feel forced whatsoever, and I actually felt it with her passing. The soundtrack was amazing for both, the cinematography was spot on, the pacing got a little weird but overall was pretty good. I loved TAS.

The originals, however, not so much. Sam Raimi has a very specific style with his movies, and while I can appreciate that with his more campy movies, it just didn't feel right with Spiderman. The first movie was great, I can't get enough of Willem Dafoe, and his portrayal of Green Goblin is a classic. But Raimi's version of Peter Parker was way too whiny and Mary Jane was not portrayed well. Spiderman 2 was decent, there were scenes I thought were goofy but it wasn't terrible. And then Spiderman 3 was just terrible. I understand he didn't want to put Venom in so he just shoehorned him in, but come on. If you're gonna do it, do it right! And don't get me started on Emo Parker and that embarrassing dance walk down the street / in the club with Gwen.
Logged

Want a custom avatar? Shoot me a PM, you can view my work here!

Darth Knox
Knight Commander
OVER 9000!!
*********

Force Alignment: -1913
Posts: 11751


(Dark points only) Do not hesitate. Show no mercy


« Reply #36423 on: August 21, 2016, 02:05:03 AM »

Reposting this in case you guys missed it

"Nostalgia Critic did a great "old vs new" comparing the Spiderman movies. Really interesting. See if you guys agree
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KP2GMV8aKaY&amp;feature=youtu.be" target="_blank" class="aeva_link bbc_link new_win">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KP2GMV8aKaY&amp;feature=youtu.be</a>
"
Logged

LivingBrain
Knight Lt. Commander
*

Force Alignment: 46
Posts: 459



« Reply #36424 on: August 21, 2016, 02:21:52 AM »

Alright, I understand your argument and you've brought up good points, especially the unfinished arc with Uncle Ben. However, looking at this purely from the cinematic universe, and not using the comics as a reference to the character, this Spiderman didn't need a catharsis from being too arrogant. He was a teenager that acted upon impulse and that tragically lead to Ben's death. But as you said, the other deaths, especially Gwen's, weren't his fault. Gwen made a point to Peter just before the fight that she controls her own actions, and any consequences would fall on her. Therefore, this Spiderman wasn't meant to be a character that suffered from being arrogant and thus didn't need an event to go through a transformation to come out a better hero. I think as a comic book character, that's pivotal, but as a movie it wasn't a factor they focused on. One could say that, yes, this is the result of ignorance of the character; I think one could say it was intentional to mirror events from the comics without the same narrative.

Looking at this strictly using no other source material, these were two solid movies. The first TAS was great in establishing the origin of Peter Parker / Spiderman while creating another subplot of mystery with his parents. You're correct to bring up Uncle Ben's arc being pushed to the side in favor of the main antagonist, I have no argument against that. The second movie got a little shaky with their character designs, especially Goblin, but I loved that Rhino wasn't just some guy in a suit (lmao well he was, but at least this suit was mechanical Cool), and I appreciate what they did with Electro. I was genuinely intrigued with where they were going with Norman Osborn as well as how Harry's actions would affect our hero. Gwen and Peter had a lot of chemistry that didn't feel forced whatsoever, and I actually felt it with her passing. The soundtrack was amazing for both, the cinematography was spot on, the pacing got a little weird but overall was pretty good. I loved TAS.

The originals, however, not so much. Sam Raimi has a very specific style with his movies, and while I can appreciate that with his more campy movies, it just didn't feel right with Spiderman. The first movie was great, I can't get enough of Willem Dafoe, and his portrayal of Green Goblin is a classic. But Raimi's version of Peter Parker was way too whiny and Mary Jane was not portrayed well. Spiderman 2 was decent, there were scenes I thought were goofy but it wasn't terrible. And then Spiderman 3 was just terrible. I understand he didn't want to put Venom in so he just shoehorned him in, but come on. If you're gonna do it, do it right! And don't get me started on Emo Parker and that embarrassing dance walk down the street / in the club with Gwen.

Lol I think this is fascinating because I'm the complete opposite! I thought Raimi felt right for Spider-Man!

I do get what you're saying with the AMAZING movies being better separate from the material. I remember thinking when I watched them, "if this weren't an adaptation of Spider-Man, but some OTHER superhero having to deal with the mystery of his parents, I would be much more on board with this." So you're right that it's an interesting deviation in itself.

So, the reason I like the Raimi movies is that they get the inner life of the character. The first movie had an incredible reworking of the origin (the rest of the movie is spotty but good enough) and SPIDER-MAN 2 absolutely nailed the character's significance. He had to struggle with balancing his personal and superhero life while dealing with cosmically bad luck (ranging from things like being late to MJ's play because of a crime or even small things like never being able to get a treat at the party for John Jameson because someone would always take the last one on the tray before him), and Doc Ock's story amplified the meaning of "with great power comes great responsibility" with how he was using his abilities for his own ego rather than the good of mankind. The personal issues also bring Spidey to a breaking point and have him wonder if he's done enough, but then he realizes that he needs to keep doing it because it's the right thing. He also learns this lesson in a much deeper way with his interaction with Aunt May, where he finally decides to tell her and she reinforces the impact Spider-Man has on others, making him see his duty not just as repaying a debt to Uncle Ben, but as serving the rest of the world as well. It reinforces the lesson of "with great power comes great responsibility," while expanding it to a much larger scale in a way that hits very emotionally.

This is why it's so believable when he gives Ock the speech at the end about "holding steady and letting go of your dreams for the sake of others" (I'm paraphrasing), because it's him taking the lesson he learned in the first movie to a new place while also realizing that life can't be the way he wants it to so he has to do the best with what he's given. It's resolving two different arcs within Spider-Man while also resolving Ock's, and it's beautiful.

I do think you're right about MJ to an extent. While I don't think she's nearly as bad as others say she is, I do think she was much more functional within the plot rather than as a character herself.

As I posted earlier to Knox, I think Raimi nailed the inner lives of the characters, but he missed the fun, external characteristics. I think this is what contributes people to seeing these movies as being very mopey, because there's not much zest to balance out the soap opera.

The AMAZING movies, on the other hand, I feel were all zest and no soap opera, and I feel much more inclined to choose the Raimi ones because I prefer the strong emotional cores that they have to the more flashy feel of the AMAZING ones.

I think the AMAZING movies were well directed, which is what you're getting at with visual design, cinematography, actor chemistry, etc., but I think the stories are a mess, for reasons I've described. It feels to me like something elemental is missing from those movies, even though I like some of the details and, while the Raimi movies may not have all of the details, they have what I feel is missing from the AMAZING movies.

So yeah, you have a lot of good points too! And I think we can both definitely agree that SPIDER-MAN 3 sucks (even though I do think it sucks less than most people say it does).  Cheesy

And thanks for sharing that, Knox. I've seen it, but I'm not a huge fan of Nostalgia Critic, and I don't think he's quite on the ball with this one.
Logged

I like movies, Spider-Man, and lightsabers.

That's about it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

My username and avatar may be of a villain, but I like Light Side points.

DarthScrub
Knight Commander
*

Force Alignment: -580
Posts: 1704


Fin Fus Fent Stin Zu'u


« Reply #36425 on: August 21, 2016, 02:34:00 AM »

I respect your opinion, and this is why I love movies! Our opinions are completely subjective to what we want out of the experience. Two people can walk out of a theater having seen the same movie and still experience two very different films. Thanks for the convo, and I love that you did watch with a true love for the source material! Also Imma help you with your points since your sig says you like light but someone gave you a dark lol
Logged

Want a custom avatar? Shoot me a PM, you can view my work here!

LivingBrain
Knight Lt. Commander
*

Force Alignment: 46
Posts: 459



« Reply #36426 on: August 21, 2016, 02:38:59 AM »

I respect your opinion, and this is why I love movies! Our opinions are completely subjective to what we want out of the experience. Two people can walk out of a theater having seen the same movie and still experience two very different films. Thanks for the convo, and I love that you did watch with a true love for the source material! Also Imma help you with your points since your sig says you like light but someone gave you a dark lol

Haha thanks, I appreciate that! The convo and the point!

I was really confused when I saw them because I wondered if I pissed someone off or something, but then I thought that maybe it was the username/avatar (it's a minor Spidey villain from one of my favorite issues) was making people think I preferred the DS points. I don't know for sure, but I appreciate the help.  Cheesy

I've also given you a DS point!!!
Logged

I like movies, Spider-Man, and lightsabers.

That's about it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

My username and avatar may be of a villain, but I like Light Side points.

Kham-Ryn Kurios
Sentinel Prime; Knight of the HoloNet Order
SaberForum.Com Moderator
Knight Commander
OVER 9000!!
*****

Force Alignment: 1723
Posts: 12447


I am Mr. Yellow.


« Reply #36427 on: August 21, 2016, 03:09:07 AM »

I like to watch my own weird canon of the Spider-Man films:

Amazing Spider-Man
Amazing Spider-Man 2
Spider-Man 2
Spider-Man 3
Logged


/LIGHT SIDE POINTS PLEASE\
‎Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you. - Friedrich Nietzsche

LivingBrain
Knight Lt. Commander
*

Force Alignment: 46
Posts: 459



« Reply #36428 on: August 21, 2016, 03:13:15 AM »

I like to watch my own weird canon of the Spider-Man films:

Amazing Spider-Man
Amazing Spider-Man 2
Spider-Man 2
Spider-Man 3

But what about the first Raimi SPIDER-MAN?  Sad

I do see how that could sort of maybe work though, but there's a big gap after Gwen and MJ, and then you lose the context of Peter being MJ's best friend since they were kids, which is verbally referenced. But hey, she could've been an unmentioned background character.

But hey, that is a super cool idea! It is possible to rework the movies in your head to make that fit together nicely, so point for a neat headcanon!
Logged

I like movies, Spider-Man, and lightsabers.

That's about it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

My username and avatar may be of a villain, but I like Light Side points.

ThreadJack
Lady of the Order Aeon
SaberForum.Com Moderator
Knight Commander
OVER 9000!!
*****

Force Alignment: 807
Posts: 13908

Truly, she will be strong- A luminous being is she


« Reply #36429 on: August 21, 2016, 04:33:03 AM »

Triathlon training begins tomorrow!
Logged

(Sig by me!)
Now accepting dark side points.

Duff Man
The Double Triple X 4 + Fish OG of Randomness Version 2.7 of part 9 = Bacon
Knight Commander
*

Force Alignment: -358
Posts: 1518



« Reply #36430 on: August 21, 2016, 04:54:07 AM »

Triathlon training begins tomorrow!


that is where you go from KFC to Taco Bell to Pizza Hut right?
Logged

Ultra Saber SI Staff:Guardian Blue
Ultra Saber Redemption:SRD
Ultra Saber Dominix V2 LE:Dark VA
MR Construction Kit:RGB

Landen Se-Sentien
Shadow Sentinel of the Manticore Order
Knight Commander
*

Force Alignment: 1828
Posts: 3781


I work in the Darkness in service of the Light


« Reply #36431 on: August 21, 2016, 12:35:16 PM »

I have the really awesome documentary set on F13th . . . believe it or not, the sample is actually:

"ki ki ki ma ma ma"

The guy doing the music had the line "Kill her, Mommy! Kill her!" in mind when he did it.

I actually knew that. I didn't think too many other people would. Good conversation starter.

that is where you go from KFC to Taco Bell to Pizza Hut right?

Or you can opt for Dairy Queen. That's a legal move. I'll allow it.
Logged

Signature banner by DarthScrub

Darth Knox
Knight Commander
OVER 9000!!
*********

Force Alignment: -1913
Posts: 11751


(Dark points only) Do not hesitate. Show no mercy


« Reply #36432 on: August 21, 2016, 12:36:22 PM »

Triathlon training begins tomorrow!

will we see you at the Tokyo olympics in 2020?
Logged

Rapine
Honoured Recipient of the Warlord Order
SaberForum.Com Moderator
Knight Commander
*****

Force Alignment: -3020
Posts: 7792


Always scanning the horizon...


« Reply #36433 on: August 21, 2016, 12:59:16 PM »

Or you can opt for Dairy Queen. That's a legal move. I'll allow it.
What about Wendy's Baconator?  Surely that ought to count. Smiley Tongue
Logged

"The thing that always drives me hazy, is wondering whether it's them or me who's crazy." ~ A. Einstein

Landen Se-Sentien
Shadow Sentinel of the Manticore Order
Knight Commander
*

Force Alignment: 1828
Posts: 3781


I work in the Darkness in service of the Light


« Reply #36434 on: August 21, 2016, 01:22:10 PM »

What about Wendy's Baconator?  Surely that ought to count. Smiley Tongue

Timeout!

*the judges confer*

"This is always the hardest part of any competition. You have some momentum, and then an issue arises."
"Yes, indeed. Everything had definitely shifted his way, and now everything comes to a halt."
"I don't even know what's taking so long. It's obvious to me what this should be ruled. Let's bring in our rules expert."
"Ok, what we have here is a challenge to allow the Wendy's Baconator to be part of the unhealthy triathlon. Now, the menu at Wendy's clearly states that the Baconator is a 1/4 pound burger with 2 slices of cheese and three slices of bacon. The only issue is to whether or not the referee in this case will allow the single, or if it has to be a double Baconator to count."
"Ah, I see. That was a clause I was not aware of. Thank you for the explanation. What do you think it should be?"
"Well, considering how much sodium and saturated fat are in a single Baconator, I have to say..."
"Sorry to cut you off, but we have our decision!"

"After further review, it has been determined that the Baconator will be allowed!"

"And the crowd erupts with their approval!! Oh, wow! This is really going to put him over the top! There's no stopping him now."
Logged

Signature banner by DarthScrub

Pages: 1 ... 2427 2428 [2429] 2430 2431 ... 3571   Go Up
Send this topic | Print
Jump to: