1. I'm pretty sure the pilot didn't die before the bombs dropped. The bombardier did.
They should both be in the cockpit. Since one is useless without the other, they should be in a similar location.
2. Even our Navy's fleet is identified by different fleet names.
However, each group just calls itself a fleet.
https://www.navysite.de/navy/fleet.htmThe importance of this fleet is that Leia was there. To think that they would not have their overall fleet scattered for protection is not realistic.
Our fleets have different names, but do we call it "The United States Fleet"? It is "an United States fleet" or "the 7th fleet". This was referred to as "The Rebel fleet" and that destroying this fleet would bring about the end of the Rebellion.
When other fleets are mentioned, they're not rebel fleets. It's others that "might" help or that might be "sympathetic" to the cause. When Leia is waiting in the old Rebel base, she is saying that the hope for the Galaxy has gone dry because they are going to die.
I don't see anything to suggest there's more Rebel ships. More potential rebels, yes, but none in the Rebellion at the time.
2.5 Hubris? Hux and Snoke wanting the kill and the glory all to themselves. Out of range? Other fleets couldn't make it.
Maybe.
3. He also knew to keep his eyes shut when the Ark was opened. How? He also climbed aboard a German u-boat and got on board without being detected. He would have had to open the main hatch of the conning tower and climb inside. This would've dropped him right into the Control Room, which would've been full of officers, including the ship's captain, preparing for the dive. How was he not detected?
In some cases we reeeeeeeally have to suspend our belief.
I can't speak for the U-Boat because I don't know much about that. I do know that anyone who knows anything about the Ark of the Covenant knows not to look inside it. It is said a piece of God is inside the Ark, and no mortal man can survive looking at the face of God.
I'm also not talking about the Mary Sue/Gary Stu knowledge. I'm talking about literally surviving explosions. Like the explosions in Episode 2 that killed Padme's double? These were bigger explosions that Poe was closer to, and yet he didn't even get burned or require any medical attention. It's hard to suspend disbelief when it's your eyes that are disbelieving.
4. As a teacher, I have quite a few students who I really like on a personal level, even though they make my life a living hell in the classroom. You ever work with someone like that? She's having to wear two hats. She has to keep him in line while others are around, but in private, with Leia, she can freely admit that his heart, drive, and ability to question authority are exactly what the rebels need.
So...she could lecture him in private. If she likes his heart and drive, she should encourage that, but check his rash behavior. Instead she belittles him.
5. You don't like either Finn, what they are doing with his character, or some combination. Got it. Moving on.
I loved Finn in TFA because he was, in my opinion, one of the best developed characters in the Star Wars movies. You see him change his loyalty, you see him go from a coward who's running away from his problems to a hero who is standing up for what's right. You can see his demeanor change when he's making excuses in the first half of TFA, to when he becomes the hero in the second half.
The problem is that his character arc was basically complete. Where does he grow from there? So all they did is in TLJ they made him do the same thing. The first half, he just wants to run away from his problems and gives excuses for why he's doing so, and in the second half he's a hero who is willing to sacrifice himself for the Rebellion.
I liked coward Finn as a character. You had to try and figure out what's really going on with him. I also liked hero Finn. What I don't like is multiple personality or bipolar Finn that goes back and forth between hero and coward, based simply on the movie recycling his character arc.
6. So if someone saw you do your thing in a bar fight, would they dismiss it as ridiculous, or would they assume you've had some level of training/experience/knowledge? Why can't we assume that Rose had some? The movie was already too long, but now you want some exposition on Rose? That's what gave us the prequels and the spinoff movies, too. Do we really need the backstory for everyone? Why can't we just sit back, accept some things, and enjoy them?
Well I already think the whole Finn/Rose plot could be scrapped, so if that happens there's no need for any backstory. In fact, we did get some backstory on Rose, in a couple of cases:
*Her sister was on the bomber
*She's a mechanic (it's said, not shown)
*She's from the planet they're going to and has some history there (again, said, not shown)
If they would have just made her a security officer, it would make sense she'd be running security on the escape pods, that she'd be a pilot, and that she'd know about tracking programs. But all the exposition they give her conflicts with what they show in the movie. What's said and what's shown are two different things.
8. We don't know how long it took for the FO to regroup and mount their attack. It could have been days. I agree, it's a stretch, but again, do we need to know everything? This is common in SW. Luke's training with Yoda comes to mind.
The shuttle crashed into the base, and it appeared they were immediately besieged. It shouldn't take a fleet of several Star Destroyers that long to deploy a ground assault, even if the main ship was destroyed.
9. How is it a loose thread? It happened in the movie. When it happened, I thought it was going to be overheard by a passing officer and blow their cover. It was that loud.
I'm not sure what I meant by loose thread. I might have been thinking about something else or typing in the wrong spot. I wrote my response to yours right after waking up.
However, it was a tiny glimmer of relevance in a large plot that really went nowhere, and it could have been scrapped to give the movie a better run time.
10. I agree that Luke's trial made sense, but we also have hindsight and deeper knowledge with which to view it. Rey's may make sense in time. It was confusing, but it didn't ruin the movie. As for the narration, it's a stylistic device. Some people show, and some people tell. You may not prefer it, but that doesn't make it wrong.
Movies in the same series should be shot in the same style. Star Wars is an adventure story that you experience as its happening. If they want to do different with the side stories that's one thing, but to change the style of the main anthology is jarring. It doesn't feel like a Star Wars movie in the way that the others have.
17. Possibly. Should they just forever keep things the same way? They did that with Finn, and you don't like that. Or should they advance characters, skills, knowledge, weapons, etc.?
My problem with Finn is that his character development was undone. He went from coward to hero in TFA, and then started again as a coward and went back to hero in TLJ. In Episode 9, is he going to go from coward to hero again?
As far as keeping things the same...you have a universe. The Star Wars universe. It has rules about how Hyperspace works, how shields work, how the Force works, how space battles work, etc. To change those rules is to change the fabric of the universe that's been created. Let's say we take Lord of the Rings, and give the humans defending Minas Tirith a bunch of .50 cal machine guns and 80mm artillery cannons. I mean, that's different from the Battle of Helms Deep, right?
I want to see new stories within the rules established in the Star Wars universe. Otherwise it's a continuity error.
I should clarify what I meant. I thought we hear Rey talking about what happened, and then see her sitting in the hut, talking about it to Kylo. I agree though, this many flashbacks definitely feel out of place for a Star Wars film.
It was clear what you meant. It wasn't clear in the movie.